Erausquin v. Notz, Stucki Management (Bermuda) Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing equal protection claim based upon First Amendment retaliation as duplicative of a First Amendment retaliation claim
• denying motion to dismiss where the plaintiff was “attempting to assert an equal protection claim based upon retaliation for First Amendment activity” because the “claim is completely duplicative of the First Amendment retaliation claim,” which had “already been dismissed.”
• “[The] plaintiffs participation in the quota policy arbitration is not protected by the First Amendment because he did not publicly testify and was only able to participate in the arbitration because of his position as a police officer.”
• “[The] plaintiffs participation in the quota policy arbitration is not protected by the First Amendment because he did not publicly testify and was only able to participate in the arbitration because of his position as a police officer”
• “[T]o the extent that plaintiff also may be attempting to assert an equal protection claim based upon retaliation for First Amendment . . . , such a claim is completely duplicative of the First Amendment retaliation claim[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).