New Mexico Court of Appeals· 3/21/1994
Dingus v. Third Street Grocery
Citations
- 117 N.M. 727
- 876 P.2d 656
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- key consideration under discovery rule is knowledge of the facts, not knowledge of the legal basis for the cause of action
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Alarid, Bivins, Hartz, Motions
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Hennessy v. DuryeaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1998-01-14· cited 698×
- Maestas Ex Rel. Estate of Varela v. ZagerNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2007-01-23· cited 73×
- Weinstein v. City of Santa Fe Ex Rel. Santa Fe Police DepartmentNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1996-04-01· cited 60×
- Delta Automatic Systems, Inc. v. BinghamNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1998-12-10· cited 58×
- Chavez v. Mountain States ConstructorsNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1996-12-02· cited 48×
- Leo v. Cornucopia RestaurantNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1994-07-19· cited 30×
- LaMure v. PetersNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1996-08-29· cited 29×
- Coslett v. Third Street GroceryNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1994-05-11· cited 27×
- Christus St. Vincent Reg'l Med. Ctr. v. Duarte-AfarNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2011-05-09· cited 23×
- Martinez-Sandoval v. KirschNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1994-08-24· cited 18×
- State v. Reyes-ArreolaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1999-05-06· cited 16×
- State Ex Rel. Udall v. Public Employees Retirement BoardNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1994-09-28· cited 13×
- Lucero v. Smith's Food & Drug Centers, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1994-06-08· cited 11×
- Lucero v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2002-05-20· cited 10×
- Grubelnik v. Four-Four, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2001-06-22· cited 9×
- West v. Home Care ResourcesNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1999-02-05· cited 6×
- Pedroza v. Lomas Auto Mall, Inc.D. New Mexico· 2009-01-28· cited 6×
- Banks v. IMC Kalium Carlsbad Potash Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2002-10-24· cited 3×
- Chavez v. Mountain States ConstructionNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1995-04-04· cited 1×
Cites
28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1993-08-09· cited 1,468×
- Green v. BiddleSupreme Court· 1823-02-27· cited 544×
- Lawson v. Suwannee Fruit & Steamship Co.Supreme Court· 1949-02-14· cited 232×
- Schmitz v. SmentowskiNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1990-01-10· cited 173×
- Allen v. StateWashington Supreme Court· 1992-03-26· cited 146×
- Saiz Ex Rel. Estate of Saiz v. Belen School DistrictNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1992-02-21· cited 77×
- Vigil Ex Rel. Estate of Vigil v. MartinezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1992-03-18· cited 38×
- Noland v. Young Drilling CompanyNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1968-08-16· cited 28×
- Madrid v. University of CaliforniaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1987-03-18· cited 28×
- City and County of Denver v. Denver Tramway CorporationEighth Circuit· 1927-12-08· cited 28×
- ABF Freight System v. MontanoNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1982-12-07· cited 27×
- Whittenberg v. Graves Oil & Butane Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1991-12-09· cited 20×
- Bowles v. Los Lunas SchoolsNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1989-09-26· cited 19×
- Barela v. Midcon of New Mexico, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1989-11-07· cited 18×
- Holliday v. Talk of the Town Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1982-06-10· cited 18×
- Fierro v. Stanley's HardwareNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1986-03-27· cited 17×
- Fierro v. Stanley's HardwareNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1985-08-15· cited 10×
- San Diego Flume Co. v. SoutherNinth Circuit· 1900-10-25· cited 10×
- Zengerle v. City of SocorroNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1987-06-01· cited 9×
- Justiz v. Walgreen'sNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1987-09-16· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.