LaMure v. Peters

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining plaintiffs’ request to adopt the doctrine in an accounting malpractice action and noting the New Mexico Supreme Court’s “recent, express disinclination to adopt” the doctrine
• looking to “the point at which the [claimants] knew or should have known that they were damaged” as the appropriate time to begin the statute of limitations period under a claim of continuing harm
• had the notice of tax deficiency never been assessed, the taxpayer never would have been harmed by the accountant’s negligence, and would not have had a cause of action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).