Madrid v. University of California

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• blanket disqualification of those with specialized knowledge in psychology would not assist the jury
• “[W]ords are presumed to have been used in their ordinary sense, that is, that words are given their ordinary and usual meaning unless the context indicates otherwise.” (internal citations omitted)
• statutory construction is question of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).