Skip to main content

Repaskey v. Chicago Transit Authority

Citations

  • 326 N.E.2d 771
  • 60 Ill. 2d 185
  • 1975 Ill. LEXIS 188

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that notice provisions in analogous statute were not met where plaintiff served notice on wrong office
  • section 41 applied to plaintiff injured on an escalator on CTA property
  • section 41 applied to plaintiff injured on an escalator on CTA property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schaefer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.