New York Court of Appeals· 7/11/1978
Tenavision, Inc. v. Neuman
Citations
- 45 N.Y.2d 145
- 379 N.E.2d 1166
- 408 N.Y.S.2d 36
- 24 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 337
- 1978 N.Y. LEXIS 2105
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- anticipatory repudiation found when party overtly communicated that it would not accept television sets that were subject of contract
- “an ‘anticipatory breach’ (or, rather, breach by anticipatory repudiation
- “a seller [is] relieved of the obligation to make a tender where the buyer [states] that he would not receive or pay for the goods ... [and] in these circumstances, as a matter of law, defendants may not escape liability by asserting a failure to tender by the seller.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cooke
Read full opinion on CourtListenerOther cases named Tenavision, Inc. v. Neuman
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.