· 6/20/1932
Dickason v. Dickason
Citations
- 12 P.2d 280
- 40 Ariz. 377
- 1932 Ariz. LEXIS 214
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “ ‘The repeal and simultaneous reenactment of substantially the same statutory provisions is to be construed not as an implied repeal of the original statute, but as a continuation thereof.’ ” (quoting 39 Cyc. 1084(E))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lockwood, McAlister, Ross
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.