Skip to main content
· 6/20/1932

Dickason v. Dickason

Citations

  • 12 P.2d 280
  • 40 Ariz. 377
  • 1932 Ariz. LEXIS 214

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “ ‘The repeal and simultaneous reenactment of substantially the same statutory provisions is to be construed not as an implied repeal of the original statute, but as a continuation thereof.’ ” (quoting 39 Cyc. 1084(E))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lockwood, McAlister, Ross

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.