Dickinson v. Duck (In Re Borelli)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “District court review satisfies the constitutional standard set forth in [Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co., 458 U.S. 50, 79 (1982)].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Eastman v. Eastman (In Re Eastman)
  Ninth Circuit· 1995-10-30· cited 48×
• MacLeod v. Dalkon Shield Trust
  D. Oregon· 1995-05-04· cited 7×
• First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Drake (In Re Ramada Inn-Paragould General Partnership)
  E.D. Arkansas· 1992-03-13· cited 7×
• McVey v. Johnson
  S.D. Texas· 2016-03-21· cited 7×
• Farmers National Bank of Opelika v. Robertson (In Re Robertson)
  M.D. Alabama· 2001-02-05· cited 6×
• Cook v. Cook
  E.D. Michigan· 1997-10-09· cited 6×
• In re D'Angelo
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2012-08-07· cited 6×
• Driggers v. Exchange Parts of America, Inc. (In Re Exchange Parts of America, Inc.)
  W.D. Arkansas· 1992-03-18· cited 2×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.
  Supreme Court· 1982-10-04· cited 3,187×
• Bradley v. School Bd. of Richmond
  Supreme Court· 1974-05-15· cited 1,967×
• Trustees of Boston University v. Brown
  Supreme Court· 1990-06-18· cited 387×
• Gary Bryant v. Ford Motor Co.
  Ninth Circuit· 1989-09-25· cited 87×
• Blackburn v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Northern Ohio (In Re GF Corp.)
  N.D. Ohio· 1991-03-07· cited 10×
• McDevitt & Street Co. v. Hammons/Clark Partnership No. 1 (In Re Clark)
  W.D. North Carolina· 1991-04-30· cited 6×