Eastman v. Eastman (In Re Eastman)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that statutory language and legislative history demonstrate that the test under § 305(a
• stating § 305(c) “does not prohibit or restrict appeals to the Panel or the district court, but only further appeals to the circuit courts of appeal and the United States Supreme Court.”
• “Section 305(c) does not prohibit or restrict appeals to the Panel or the district court, but only further appeals to the circuit courts of appeal and the United States Supreme Court.”
• \The test is whether both the debtor and the creditors would be 'better served' by a dismissal ...\
• under section 305(a), “the test is whether both the debtor and the creditors would be ‘better served’ by a dismissal.”
• “The courts that have construed § 305(a)(1) are in general agreement that abstention in a properly filed bankruptcy case is an extraordinary remedy, and that dismissal is appropriate under § 305(a)(1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).