Oregon Supreme Court· 3/24/1977
Dickinson v. Davis
Citations
- 561 P.2d 1019
- 277 Or. 665
- 1977 Ore. LEXIS 1181
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- describing the importance to judicial review of a proper agency order when the agency makes a discretionary decision pursuant to broad statutory authority
- describing discretion as a range of responsible choices in pursuing objectives “more or less broadly indicated by the legislature (or, in Oregon, by the people themselves) under various circumstances pertinent to those objectives”
- Public Utility Commissioner’s reasons for predicted effect of sanctions, “when properly articulated, are entitled to the deference commonly accorded agency ‘expertise’ insofar as they reflect” matters within the commissioner’s expertise
- discretion to mitigate sanctions must have explainable reasons
- discretion to mitigate sanctions must have explainable reasons
- discussing the nature of discretion in administrative proceedings
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Denecke, C.J., and Holman, Tongue, Howell, Bryson, Lent and Linde
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. RobertsonOregon Supreme Court· 1982-08-03· cited 334×
- State v. ClarkOregon Supreme Court· 1981-06-23· cited 211×
- Megdal v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersOregon Supreme Court· 1980-01-08· cited 147×
- Nearing v. WeaverOregon Supreme Court· 1983-10-04· cited 98×
- State v. FreelandOregon Supreme Court· 1983-07-26· cited 89×
- McBride v. MagnusonOregon Supreme Court· 1978-05-23· cited 89×
- Stevenson v. State Ex Rel. Department of TransportationOregon Supreme Court· 1980-11-04· cited 87×
- Lowrimore v. DimmittOregon Supreme Court· 1990-09-20· cited 54×
- 1000 Friends v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionOregon Supreme Court· 1988-03-29· cited 45×
- State v. Harrell / WilsonOregon Supreme Court· 2013-02-28· cited 36×
- Hardwick v. Dravo Equipment Co.Oregon Supreme Court· 1977-09-27· cited 32×
- Davidson v. Oregon Government Ethics CommissionOregon Supreme Court· 1985-12-24· cited 28×
- Appalachian Power Co. v. Public Service CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1982-05-28· cited 27×
- Mary's Fine Food, Inc. v. Oregon Liquor Control CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1977-08-08· cited 20×
- Gearhart v. Public Utility CommissionOregon Supreme Court· 2014-10-02· cited 18×
- Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp. v. JacobsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-11-03· cited 15×
- Groener v. Oregon Government Ethics CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1982-09-29· cited 11×
- Dundas v. Lincoln CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1980-10-27· cited 11×
- VECO International, Inc. v. Alaska Public Offices CommissionAlaska Supreme Court· 1988-04-01· cited 11×
- Civil Rights Division of Bureau of Labor v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court· 1977-12-20· cited 7×
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.