Skip to main content
· 3/24/1977

Dickinson v. Davis

Citations

  • 561 P.2d 1019
  • 277 Or. 665
  • 1977 Ore. LEXIS 1181

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • describing the importance to judicial review of a proper agency order when the agency makes a discretionary decision pursuant to broad statutory authority
  • describing discretion as a range of responsible choices in pursuing objectives “more or less broadly indicated by the legislature (or, in Oregon, by the people themselves) under various circumstances pertinent to those objectives”
  • Public Utility Commissioner’s reasons for predicted effect of sanctions, “when properly articulated, are entitled to the deference commonly accorded agency ‘expertise’ insofar as they reflect” matters within the commissioner’s expertise
  • discretion to mitigate sanctions must have explainable reasons
  • discretion to mitigate sanctions must have explainable reasons
  • discussing the nature of discretion in administrative proceedings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Denecke, C.J., and Holman, Tongue, Howell, Bryson, Lent and Linde

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.