Dickens v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming restitution amount based on victim's out-of-pocket cost and noting that fair market value is appropriate but not exclusive method for determining restitution
• affirming restitution amount based on victim’s out-of-pocket cost and noting that fair market value is appropriate but not exclusive method for determining restitution
• trial court best able to determine award that serves goals of restitution; discretion exists to reject fair market value, pursue any other measure of loss that compensates victim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Hawthorne
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1991-01-03· cited 121×
• Alger v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1994-11-22· cited 56×
• State v. Hall
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2013-06-28· cited 55×
• State v. Gill
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 2004-06-30· cited 17×
• Butts v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-03-14· cited 14×
• C.M.S. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-12-31· cited 10×
• Hawthorne v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-03-14· cited 6×
• House v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-03-04· cited 5×
• SHAN C DAVIS v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-04-18· cited 3×
• Mark Anthony Tolbert v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-04-22· cited 2×
• CMS v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-12-31
• Bishop v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-08-02

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Spivey v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1988-10-06· cited 44×
• Garrison v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-12-27· cited 10×
• Norman v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-05-14· cited 9×