Skip to main content

Alger v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 450 S.E.2d 765
  • 19 Va. App. 252
  • 1994 Va. App. LEXIS 687

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that trial courts may properly consider victim impact statements when determining the appropriate amount of restitution owed by a defendant
  • holding that courts may properly consider victim impact statements when determining the appropriate amount of restitution owed by a defendant
  • finding no abuse of discretion in trial court’s “accepting the amounts paid by the insurance company and the deductible as proper for purposes of restitution”
  • restitution statutes to be read in pari materia with victim impact statute which defines \victim\ as \an individual ... who has suffered ... economic harm\ from the crimes.
  • restitution statutes to be read in pari materia with victim impact statute which defines “victim” as “an individual ... who has suffered ... economic harm” from the crimes.
  • “In the sentencing phase of a case, the trial court may rely upon hearsay testimony.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.