Skip to main content

State v. Hall

Citations

  • 297 Kan. 709
  • 304 P.3d 677
  • 2013 WL 3242252
  • 2013 Kan. LEXIS 583

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that there is no bright-line rule favoring either retail or wholesale value in ordering restitution
  • discussing the proper amount of restitution in a similar case of theft from an animal clinic
  • affirming Court of Appeals decision \as right for the wrong reason\
  • In fashioning a restitution order, the district court may consider either the wholesale cost or retail value of inventory stolen from a commercial enterprise.
  • \The fair market value of inventory is the price that a willing seller and a willing buyer would agree upon in an arm's length-transaction.\
  • \The measure of restitution to be ordered is the amount that reimburses the victim for the actual loss suffered.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beier

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.