District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2/8/2013
Diaz v. State
Citations
- 106 So. 3d 515
- 2013 WL 466219
- 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 1999
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that trial court was not permitted to consider truthfulness of defendant’s guilt phase testimony as sentencing factor
- “[A] trial court cannot base a sentence on the truthfulness of the defendant’s testimony.”
- \[A] trial court cannot base a sentence on the truthfulness of the defendant’s testimony.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Casanueva, Crenshaw, Larose
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida· 1986-07-17· cited 2,703×
- Yisrael v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2008-02-21· cited 119×
- Postell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-04-28· cited 84×
- Twilegar v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2010-01-07· cited 73×
- Bracero v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-04-17· cited 40×
- Hannum v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-06-05· cited 40×
- Forester v. Norman Roger Jewell & Brooks Intern., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-12-30· cited 28×
- Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-02-05· cited 18×
- Love v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-01-09· cited 18×
- Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-06-10· cited 14×
- Roman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-09-01· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.