Skip to main content

Smith v. State

Citations

  • 62 So. 3d 698
  • 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 8446
  • 2011 WL 2279030

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the trial court committed fundamental error by considering the truthfulness of the defendant’s testimony during sentencing
  • \It is also improper for the court to consider the truthfulness of a defendant's testimony when imposing sentence.\
  • “ ‘It is impermissible for a trial court to consider a defendant’s assertions of his innocence and refusal to admit guilt in imposing sentence.’”
  • “It is also improper for the court to consider the truthfulness of a defendant’s testimony when imposing sentence.”
  • express consideration of such improper factors in sentencing denies due process and constitutes fundamental error requiring reversal and resentencing before a different judge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Khouzam, Davis, Black

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.