Fourth Circuit· 8/7/2020
Diana Mey v. DIRECTV, LLC
Citations
- 971 F.3d 284
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the plaintiff’s signing of an acknowledgement of the arbitration agreement demonstrated her assent to that agreement
- enforcing an arbitration agreement contained in a contract signed only by the party resisting arbitration
- applying ordinary meaning, companies were affiliates “by virtue of their common ownership”
- “But we have time and again, emphasized that we must interpret and enforce the words of the particular arbitration provision to which the parties agreed.”
- “As with any contract, we must first be satisfied that an agreement to arbitrate has been formed. We resolve this question according to state law principles governing contract formation.”
- “The heavy presumption of arbitrability requires that when the scope of the arbitration clause is open to question, a court must decide the question in favor of arbitration.” (quoting Levin v. Alms & Assocs., Inc., 634 F.3d 260, 266 (4th Cir. 2011))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Michael Coady v. Nationwide Motor Sales Corp.Fourth Circuit· 2022-04-25· cited 17×
- Xiaomi Corporation v. U.S. Department of DefenseDistrict of Columbia· 2021-03-12
- Luokung Technology Corp. v. U.S. Department of DefenseDistrict of Columbia· 2021-05-05
- Tyler Preston v. island Saints Corp.Superior Court of The Virgin Islands· 2024-10-09
- Berkeley County School District v. HUB International LimitedFourth Circuit· 2025-03-07
Cites
39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court· 1983-02-23· cited 9,657×
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court· 1960-06-20· cited 5,791×
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court· 1995-05-22· cited 4,743×
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court· 1985-07-02· cited 3,702×
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court· 1989-03-06· cited 2,861×
- Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court· 1997-02-18· cited 2,720×
- Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court· 2002-12-10· cited 1,948×
- Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. CardegnaSupreme Court· 2006-02-21· cited 1,641×
- Stolt-Nielsen S. A. v. AnimalFeeds International Corp.Supreme Court· 2010-04-27· cited 1,358×
- Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.Supreme Court· 1995-03-06· cited 1,102×
- King v. BurwellSupreme Court· 2015-06-25· cited 932×
- United States v. GonzalesSupreme Court· 1997-03-03· cited 905×
- Home Depot U. S. A., Inc. v. JacksonSupreme Court· 2019-05-28· cited 714×
- Ali v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsSupreme Court· 2008-01-22· cited 685×
- Graham County Soil & Water Conservation District v. United States Ex Rel. WilsonSupreme Court· 2010-03-30· cited 421×
- Lamps Plus, Inc. v. VarelaSupreme Court· 2019-04-24· cited 381×
- Adkins v. Labor Ready, Inc.Fourth Circuit· 2002-08-30· cited 317×
- J.J. Ryan & Sons, Inc. v. Rhone Poulenc Textile, S.A.Fourth Circuit· 1988-12-13· cited 143×
- Levin v. Alms and Associates, Inc.Fourth Circuit· 2011-02-10· cited 139×
- Peoples Security Life Insurance Company v. Monumental Life Insurance Company B. Larry Jenkins Ronald J. Brittingham Thomas R. Jenkins, (Two Cases)Fourth Circuit· 1989-02-10· cited 124×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.