Skip to main content

Kohn v. Kohn

Citations

  • 364 A.2d 350
  • 242 Pa. Super. 435
  • 1976 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3180

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ruling that the term “alimony” was latently ambiguous in a marital settlement agreement when (1) numerous express provisions in the agreement implied that “alimony” meant child support payments, (2
  • parol evidence admitted to resolve ambiguity where the term “alimony” may have been intended to include child support
  • parol evidence may resolve an ambiguity if the meaning of a term is unclear; however, parol evidence may not alter the terms of the contract
  • extrinsic evidence employed to construe latent ambiguity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Watkins, Jacobs, Hoffman, Cercone, Price, Van Voort Spaeth, Van Voort

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.