Deutsche Post Global Mail, Ltd. v. Conrad

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• interpreting Maryland law as permitting courts to “blue-pencil” “language from restrictive covenants”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ameritox, Ltd. v. Savelich
  D. Maryland· 2015-03-11· cited 12×
• Yehuda Steiner v. American Friends of Lubavitch (Chaabad)
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2018-02-01· cited 9×
• Jones v. Genus Credit Management Corp.
  D. Maryland· 2005-01-31· cited 5×

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
• Thompson Everett, Inc. v. National Cable Advertising, L.P. Cable Networks, Inc. Cable Media Corporation
  Fourth Circuit· 1995-06-27· cited 256×
• Fowler v. Printers II, Inc.
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1991-12-03· cited 82×
• Holloway v. Faw, Casson & Co.
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-04-18· cited 61×
• Ruhl v. F. A. Bartlett Tree Expert Co.
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1967-01-05· cited 46×
• Padco Advisors, Inc. v. Omdahl
  D. Maryland· 2002-01-11· cited 45×
• Gill v. Computer Equipment Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1972-06-30· cited 35×
• Tuttle v. Riggs-Warfield-Roloson, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1968-10-08· cited 27×
• Holloway v. Faw, Casson & Co.
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1989-02-06· cited 21×
• MacIntosh v. Brunswick Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1965-12-20· cited 20×
• Intelus Corp. v. Barton
  D. Maryland· 1998-06-04· cited 20×
• Hebb v. Stump, Harvey & Cook, Inc.
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1975-04-03· cited 18×
• Telxon Corp. v. Hoffman
  N.D. Illinois· 1989-08-22· cited 15×
• Hekimian Laboratories, Inc. v. Domain Systems, Inc.
  S.D. Florida· 1987-06-23· cited 6×