Intelus Corp. v. Barton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that lack of geographic limitation is permissible when it “does not impose undue hardship”
• noting that Maryland courts determine whether the geographic scope of a restrictive covenant is reasonable by looking to the \specific facts\ of the case (quoting Ruhl , 225 A.2d at 291 )
• recognizing the role of restrictive covenants in protecting business goodwill
• lack of geographic scope was reasonable when company operated business nationwide and scope of restriction was limited to “those businesses that compete directly for the customers and accounts of Intelus”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).