Deutsch v. Flannery

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying Rule 9(b) to 14(e) claim that tender offer solicitation “failed to disclose” material information
• applying Rule 9(b) to 14(e) claim that tender offer solicitation “failed to disclose” material information
• applying issue preclusion where differences between first and second complaints “lack[ed] substantive significance”
• \[A] pleading satisfies the particularity requirement [of Rule 9(b) ] if it identifies the circumstances constituting fraud so that the defendant can prepare an adequate answer from the allegations.\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
• a determination that a complaint fails to allege fraud with particularity could preclude the refling of an identical com- plaint
• \[A] pleading satisfies the particularity requirement of [Rule 9(b) ] if it identifies the circumstances constituting fraud so that the defendant can prepare an adequate answer from the allegations.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Davidson v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.
  Ninth Circuit· 2017-10-20· cited 563×
• Concha v. London
  Ninth Circuit· 1995-08-15· cited 421×
• Ebeid Ex Rel. United States v. Lungwitz
  Ninth Circuit· 2010-08-09· cited 278×
• Galvin v. Hay
  Ninth Circuit· 2004-03-18· cited 87×
• Decker v. Glenfed, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 1994-12-09· cited 40×
• Tapia v. Davol, Inc.
  S.D. California· 2015-07-28· cited 28×
• Jennifer Davidson v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.
  Ninth Circuit· 2017-10-20· cited 24×
• Augustine v. Talking Rain Beverage Co.
  S.D. California· 2019-04-12· cited 17×
• Deutsch v. Flannery
  Ninth Circuit· 1989-08-21· cited 2×
• Jennifer Davidson v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.
  Ninth Circuit· 2018-05-09
• Colvin v. Howard University
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2021-08-19
• Manger v. Leapfrog Enterprises, Inc.
  N.D. California· 2017-01-23
• Manger v. Leapfrog Enterprises, Inc.
  N.D. California· 2017-05-09

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Allen v. McCurry
  Supreme Court· 1980-12-09· cited 4,909×
• TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1976-06-14· cited 2,447×
• Semegen v. Weidner
  Ninth Circuit· 1985-09-24· cited 476×
• Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,947 Dean Walling v. Beverly Enterprises, a California Corporation
  Ninth Circuit· 1973-04-09· cited 223×
• Joseph Segal, and Western States Telephone Co., Inc., Etc. v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company, Inc., Etc.
  Ninth Circuit· 1979-10-29· cited 110×
• Richard W. Bosse v. Crowell Collier and MacMillan
  Ninth Circuit· 1977-12-06· cited 89×
• Arnold Maxwell Harris v. George Jacobs
  Ninth Circuit· 1980-06-11· cited 80×
• Toombs v. Leone
  Ninth Circuit· 1985-11-26· cited 74×
• Norman S. Gottreich and Margareta E. Gottreich v. San Francisco Investment Corporation
  Ninth Circuit· 1977-03-15· cited 64×
• Deutsch v. Flannery
  Ninth Circuit· 1987-07-31· cited 35×
• In Re: Petition for Naturalization of Charles Peter Duncan. Charles Peter Duncan v. United States
  Ninth Circuit· 1983-08-19· cited 30×
• Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,601 South Coast Services Corp., a California Corporation v. Santa Ana Valley Irrigation Co.
  Ninth Circuit· 1982-02-24· cited 26×
• Merrit v. Libby, McNeill & Libby
  S.D. New York· 1981-01-26· cited 24×
• Oldfield v. Athletic Congress
  Ninth Circuit· 1985-12-26· cited 18×
• Deutsch v. Flannery
  S.D. New York· 1984-09-27· cited 9×