Arnold Maxwell Harris v. George Jacobs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• refusing to preclude the 4 plaintiff from pursuing its claim when that claim “was not distinctly alleged” in the prior 5 litigation and the court made no findings pertaining to the claim
• “[r]es judicata preclusion extends only to claims that arise out of the same ‘cause of action’ asserted in the prior action”
• “If there is doubt on this score, collateral estoppel will not be applied.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).