Supreme Court of Vermont· 12/9/1994
Denton v. Chittenden Bank
Citations
- 655 A.2d 703
- 163 Vt. 62
- 1994 Vt. LEXIS 182
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- directing that summary judgment is appropriate only if the alleged conduct “did not, as a matter of law, reach the level of extreme, outrage”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gibson, Dooley, Morse and Johnson, Jj., and Peck, J. (Ret.), Specially Assigned
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- GTE Southwest, Inc. v. BruceTexas Supreme Court· 1999-07-01· cited 441×
- Lawlor v. North American Corporation of IllinoisIllinois Supreme Court· 2013-03-04· cited 184×
- Sabia v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont· 1995-10-30· cited 85×
- Pion v. BeanSupreme Court of Vermont· 2003-08-29· cited 52×
- Fromson v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont· 2004-04-02· cited 52×
- Dulude v. Fletcher Allen Health Care, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont· 2002-06-28· cited 44×
- Murray v. St. Michael's CollegeSupreme Court of Vermont· 1995-09-08· cited 40×
- Lane v. Town of GraftonSupreme Court of Vermont· 1997-01-03· cited 39×
- Cate v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Vermont· 2013-08-02· cited 31×
- Schwartz v. FrankenhoffSupreme Court of Vermont· 1999-05-21· cited 28×
- Garcia v. LawsonWyoming Supreme Court· 1996-12-06· cited 27×
- Siliski v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont· 2002-08-15· cited 24×
- Dalmer v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont· 2002-08-15· cited 23×
- Adams v. AdamsSupreme Court of Vermont· 2005-01-14· cited 16×
- Jennifer Weinstein v. Jeanmarie Leonard and Carol Sayour v. Lloyd J. Weinstein and The Weinstein Group, P.C.Supreme Court of Vermont· 2015-11-13· cited 15×
- Grega v. PettengillD. Vermont· 2015-08-18· cited 15×
- Burwell v. PeytonD. Vermont· 2015-09-14· cited 10×
- Vermont Insurance Management, Inc. v. Lumbermens' Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Vermont· 2000-11-07· cited 8×
- Price v. Delta Airlines, Inc.D. Vermont· 1998-05-08· cited 8×
- Woodstock Resort Corp. v. Scottsdale InsuranceD. Vermont· 1996-05-16· cited 5×
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Wilson v. Monarch Paper Co.Fifth Circuit· 1991-08-16· cited 137×
- Boyle v. WenkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1979-08-01· cited 129×
- Drejza v. VaccaroDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1994-08-25· cited 122×
- Poplaski v. LamphereSupreme Court of Vermont· 1989-08-04· cited 111×
- Hay v. Medical Center Hosp. of VermontSupreme Court of Vermont· 1985-04-26· cited 111×
- Levy v. Town of St. Albans Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Vermont· 1989-07-14· cited 94×
- Hodgdon v. Mt. Mansfield Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1992-11-06· cited 88×
- Crump v. P & C Food Markets, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1990-05-04· cited 87×
- Fitzgerald v. CongletonSupreme Court of Vermont· 1990-10-19· cited 76×
- David K. Pratt and Teri D. Pratt v. Brown MacHine Company, a Division of John Brown, Inc.Sixth Circuit· 1988-09-07· cited 69×
- Payne v. RozendaalSupreme Court of Vermont· 1986-09-26· cited 64×
- Bower v. WeismanS.D. New York· 1986-06-30· cited 56×
- Johnson v. Federal Reserve BankAppellate Court of Illinois· 1990-05-21· cited 41×
- Messier v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont· 1990-06-01· cited 38×
- Jobin v. McQuillenSupreme Court of Vermont· 1992-04-10· cited 33×
- Bourque v. Town of BowD. New Hampshire· 1990-05-02· cited 32×
- Derosia v. Book Press, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1987-06-26· cited 25×
- Demag v. American Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Vermont· 1986-02-28· cited 22×
- Love v. Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1972-09-20· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.