Skip to main content

Dent v. State

Citations

  • 469 S.E.2d 311
  • 220 Ga. App. 147
  • 96 Fulton County D. Rep. 709
  • 1996 Ga. App. LEXIS 122

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to review admissibility issue because “it [was] clear from [the record] that defendant made no proffer of the substance of any ‘admission’ purportedly admissible against [the] non-party witness”
  • declining to review admissibility issue because “it [was] clear from [the record] that defendant made no proffer of the substance of any ‘admission’ purportedly admissible against [the] non-party witness”
  • proffer must be definite so that both courts can know whether the evidence really exists
  • counsel failed to proffer substance of evidence of false accusations; testimony excluded
  • defendant failed to make adequate proffer after state’s hearsay objection was sustained
  • counsel failed to proffer substance of evidence of false accusations; testimony excluded

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Andrews, Blackburn, McMurray

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.