Patrick v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A proffer is inadequate unless it informs the trial court, at the time the questions were propounded, what answers were expected.”
• “A proffer is inadequate unless it informs the trial court, at the time the questions were propounded, what answers were expected. If the record does not show what testimony the witness was expected to give, the judgment will not be reversed.”
• “A proffer is inadequate unless it informs the trial court, at the time the questions were propounded, what answers were expected. If the record does not show what testimony the witness was expected to give, the judgment will not be reversed.” (footnote omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Miceli v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2011-03-04· cited 4×
• John Doe v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2020-03-13
• Wesley Vick, Jr. v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2025-09-16

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Dent v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1996-02-09· cited 22×
• Stancil v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1980-09-05· cited 15×
• Thrasher v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1990-11-15· cited 3×