Seventh Circuit· 8/18/2003
Dennis Walker v. Abbott Laboratories
Citations
- 340 F.3d 471
- 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 16846
- 84 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,463
- 92 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 769
- 2003 WL 21956455
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that an at-will employment contract is sufficiently contractual in nature to maintain a § 1981 claim for discrimination
- \There is simply no rule or case law that requires litigants to move for reconsideration of an interlocutory ruling in order to avoid waiving a challenge to that ruling on appeal of a final decision.\
- “There is simply no rule or case law that requires litigants to move for reconsideration of an interlocutory ruling in order to avoid waiving a challenge to that ruling on appeal of a final decision.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Coffey, Kanne, Wood
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Hedrick G. Humphries v. Cbocs West, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2007-01-29· cited 431×
- Marcella Fane v. Locke Reynolds, LLPSeventh Circuit· 2007-03-14· cited 143×
- United States v. BrennanSecond Circuit· 2011-05-05· cited 114×
- United States v. MadridTenth Circuit· 2011-02-10· cited 42×
- Whitfield v. International Truck & Engine Corp.Seventh Circuit· 2014-06-06· cited 41×
- Roy Sargeant v. Aracelie BarfieldSeventh Circuit· 2023-11-28· cited 41×
- Blount v. StroudAppellate Court of Illinois· 2009-06-24· cited 37×
- Blount v. StroudAppellate Court of Illinois· 2009-10-06· cited 25×
- Jones v. Amerihealth CaritasE.D. Pennsylvania· 2015-03-06· cited 25×
- Adam v. Obama for AmericaN.D. Illinois· 2016-09-28· cited 24×
- Wharton v. Comcast Corp.N.D. Illinois· 2012-12-06· cited 23×
- Sutula-Johnson v. Office Depot, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2018-06-25· cited 19×
- Smith v. FarmstandN.D. Illinois· 2012-11-15· cited 17×
- Williams v. DoyleW.D. Wisconsin· 2007-05-31· cited 14×
- Walker v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin SystemW.D. Wisconsin· 2004-01-07· cited 14×
- Wesley v. Palace Rehabilitation & Care Center, L.L.C.D. New Jersey· 2014-03-12· cited 14×
- Estate of Oliva v. New JerseyD. New Jersey· 2008-09-30· cited 8×
- Blount v. StroudAppellate Court of Illinois· 2007-09-28· cited 8×
- Darke v. Lurie Besikof Lapidus & Co., LLPD. Minnesota· 2008-02-07· cited 7×
- Swearingen-El v. Cook County Sheriff's DepartmentN.D. Illinois· 2006-01-12· cited 6×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court· 1989-06-15· cited 2,518×
- Runyon v. McCrarySupreme Court· 1976-06-25· cited 1,391×
- Fellhauer v. City of GenevaIllinois Supreme Court· 1991-02-22· cited 312×
- Gary McKnight Cross-Appellant v. General Motors Corporation, Cross-AppelleeSeventh Circuit· 1990-08-21· cited 260×
- Perry v. WoodwardTenth Circuit· 1999-12-20· cited 238×
- United States v. Melvin P. DeutschSeventh Circuit· 1992-12-09· cited 190×
- Juana GONZALEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INGERSOLL MILLING MACHINE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeSeventh Circuit· 1998-01-14· cited 160×
- Spriggs v. Diamond Auto GlassFourth Circuit· 1999-01-28· cited 140×
- Jackie Lauture v. International Business MacHines CorporationSecond Circuit· 2000-06-20· cited 104×
- Valerie Bennett v. Mary Roberts, Marshal Aspinall, Timothy CostelloSeventh Circuit· 2002-07-02· cited 103×
- Lamarilyn Fadeyi v. Planned Parenthood Association of Lubbock, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1998-12-07· cited 81×
- Callis, Papa, Jackstadt & Halloran, P.C. v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court· 2001-04-19· cited 70×
- Deborah Denise Skinner v. Maritz, Inc.Eighth Circuit· 2001-06-12· cited 32×
- Alvin R. Staples v. Pepsi-Cola General Bottlers, Incorporated, a Delaware CorporationSeventh Circuit· 2002-12-03· cited 12×
Other cases named Dennis Walker v. Abbott Laboratories
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.