Skip to main content
· 1/14/1998

Juana GONZALEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INGERSOLL MILLING MACHINE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee

Citations

  • 133 F.3d 1025
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 513
  • 72 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,183
  • 75 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1624
  • 1998 WL 11058

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “However, we need not determine whether [plaintiff’s] at-will status provided adequate support for her section 1981 claim . . . . ”
  • “. . . the grounds for extension provided by [counsel] seemed more like routine problems of office management than something that could not have been anticipated.”
  • “The same standards governing liability under Title VII apply to section 1981.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wood, Kanne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.