Gallagher v. Townsend

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Loving test “provides the correct framework for evaluating off-table significant aggravation claims”
• holding that “the Loving case provides the correct framework for evaluating off-table significant aggravation claims”
• holding that the Loving test “provides the correct framework for evaluating off-table significant aggravation claims”
• holding that “the Loving case provides the correct framework for evaluating off-Table significant aggravation claims”
• holding that “the Loving case provides the correct framework for evaluating off-table significant aggravation claims”
• holding a petitioner must show “a logical sequence of cause and effect showing that the vaccination was the reason for the significant aggravation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).