Connecticut Appellate Court· 1/17/2006
Cushman v. Cushman
Citations
- 93 Conn. App. 186
- 888 A.2d 156
- 2006 Conn. App. LEXIS 25
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- appeal from trial court’s granting of motion for contempt on ground that plaintiff had violated financial terms of parties’ dissolution agreement
- \the party seeking to alter the terms of the alimony payments must ... establish that the recipient's financial needs have been altered as a result of the cohabitation\ [internal quotation marks omitted]
- ‘‘the party seeking to alter the terms of the alimony payments must . . . establish that the recipient’s financial needs have been altered as a result of the cohabitation’’ [internal quotation marks omitted]
- standard of review applicable to cohabitation determination
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Berdon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Weiss v. WeissSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-07-20· cited 66×
- Blum v. BlumConnecticut Appellate Court· 2008-07-22· cited 40×
- Zahringer v. ZahringerConnecticut Appellate Court· 2010-11-02· cited 16×
- Lehan v. LehanConnecticut Appellate Court· 2010-01-05· cited 10×
- Corrarino v. CorrarinoConnecticut Appellate Court· 2010-05-11· cited 8×
- Taylor v. TaylorConnecticut Appellate Court· 2009-09-22· cited 8×
- Aley v. AleyConnecticut Appellate Court· 2006-10-10· cited 7×
- Szegda v. SzegdaConnecticut Appellate Court· 2006-09-12· cited 7×
- Danehy v. DanehyConnecticut Appellate Court· 2009-11-17· cited 6×
- Racsko v. RacskoConnecticut Appellate Court· 2007-06-26· cited 4×
- Pishal v. PishalConnecticut Appellate Court· 2022-05-24· cited 1×
- Altraide v. AltraideConnecticut Appellate Court· 2014-10-07
- Murphy v. MurphyConnecticut Appellate Court· 2018-05-08
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Gervais v. GervaisConnecticut Appellate Court· 2005-10-11· cited 36×
- Demaria v. DemariaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-02-16· cited 35×
- Chyung v. Chi Han ChyungConnecticut Appellate Court· 2004-12-28· cited 33×
- Dombrowski v. Noyes-DombrowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-03-29· cited 29×
- Kremenitzer v. KremenitzerConnecticut Appellate Court· 2004-01-20· cited 17×
- Olson v. OlsonConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-08-27· cited 12×
- Quasius v. QuasiusConnecticut Appellate Court· 2005-02-01· cited 10×
- Distefano v. DistefanoConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-01-15· cited 9×
- Sullivan v. SullivanConnecticut Appellate Court· 2001-10-30· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.