Delgado-Ortiz v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \returning Mexicans from the United States” are \too broad” to qualify as a particular social group
• holding that generalized country conditions evidence of violence and crime that is not particular to the applicant does not establish CAT eligibility
• holding that generalized evidence of violence and crime that is not particular to petitioner is insufficient to meet the standard for CAT protection
• holding that “[a]sylum is not available to victims of indiscriminate violence, unless they are singled out on account of a protected ground”
• holding that proposed social group of Mexicans returning from the United States “is too broad to qualify as a cognizable social group”
• holding that generalized evidence of crime in Mexico was insufficient to establish prima facie eligibility for CAT protection

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).