Naseem Salman Al-Harbi v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that it is uncommon for there to be a 8 substantial justification under the EAJA when the agency’s decision was reversed because 9 it was unsupported by substantial evidence
• denying attorney’s fees under the EAJA in agency action because we upheld “the government’s central positions,” even though we reversed the agency decision on review
• “Substantial justification in this context means justification to a degree that could satisfy a reasonable person.”
• “Under the EAJA, applications for awards of attorneys’ fees must be filed ‘within 30 days of final judgment.’ ”
• “Under the EAJA, applications for awards of attorneys’ fees must be filed ‘within 30 days of final judgment.’ ”
• “Substantial justification in this con- text means justification to a degree that could satisfy a reason- able person.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).