Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 6/26/2009

Soriano v. Holder

Citations

  • 569 F.3d 1162
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 13822
  • 2009 WL 1813538

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that government informants do not qualify as a social group
  • holding mere “opposition to organized crime” does not constitute a political opinion
  • finding informing the police about gang activities insufficient to show actual or imputed political opinion
  • distinguishing “personal animosity” from well-founded fear of persecution and concluding that “[p]etitioner’s fear of future persecution stems from the criminals’ motive to retaliate against him for informing on them”
  • upholding the BIA’s no-nexus determination when the “persecution stem[med] from the criminals’ motive to retaliate against [petitioner] for informing on them,” because such motive amounted to “[p]ersonal animosity . . . not political opinion”
  • stating standards for the denial of CAT relief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rymer, Graber, Bea

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Soriano v. Holder

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.