Delaware, L. & W. R. v. Roalefs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[A]llegations in a complaint are not evidence that can be 24 used to support or oppose summary judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Woelfle
  Eighth Circuit· 1936-04-20· cited 100×
• Meaney v. United States
  Second Circuit· 1940-06-10· cited 51×
• Henderson v. Union Pacific Railroad
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1950-06-06· cited 32×
• Krug v. Mutual Ben. Health & Accident Ass'n
  Eighth Circuit· 1941-06-09· cited 24×
• Waldroop v. Driver-Miller Plumbing & Heating Corp.
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1956-09-04· cited 18×
• Central R. Co. of New Jersey v. Young
  Third Circuit· 1912-11-11· cited 15×
• United States v. Matory
  Seventh Circuit· 1934-06-21· cited 11×
• United States v. Roberts
  Tenth Circuit· 1932-11-18· cited 10×
• Ætna Life Ins. v. Quinley
  Eighth Circuit· 1937-02-04· cited 10×
• Mississippi Central Railroad v. Turnage
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1909-03-15· cited 8×
• Grand Trunk Pac. Ry. Co. v. Tollard
  Eighth Circuit· 1923-02-09· cited 2×
• United States v. Thurston
  D. Hawaii· 1912-03-08

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Northern Pacific Railroad v. Urlin
  Supreme Court· 1895-05-20· cited 78×