Henderson v. Union Pacific Railroad

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• it is improper to address individual jurors by name and extract from them oral agreements regarding certain statements made by counsel
• “Without competent medical testimony that the blow which the plaintiff received was the probable cause of the gangrene and resulting amputation, there could be no case sufficient to go to the jury on that question.” (Emphasis added.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).