Skip to main content
· 6/10/1940

Meaney v. United States

Citations

  • 112 F.2d 538
  • 130 A.L.R. 973
  • 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 4342

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting the rationale of rule 803(4) is the “probability that the patient will not fabricate statements made to the physician if the patient’s future treatment and well-being are at stake”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hand, Chase, Patterson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.