Skip to main content

Delaney v. Cade

Citations

  • 873 P.2d 175
  • 255 Kan. 199
  • 1994 Kan. LEXIS 71

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the healthcare professional failed to properly treat plaintiff's leg injury, which resulted in loss of chance that she would regain use of her legs
  • noting this distinction when applying the theory of loss of chance for a better recovery in medical malpractice cases
  • allowing paraplegic plaintiff to recover where risk of spinal cord injury was increased five to ten percent by prolonged period of shock following car accident and prior to surgery
  • distinguishing between “loss of survival” and “loss of better recovery” cases
  • \we reject scrapping causation (the bedrock of our tort law) in negligence cases where the injury alleged by the plaintiff is something less than death\
  • doctor’s treatment and delay in transferring patient, causing loss of chance for better recovery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holmes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Delaney v. Cade

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.