Skip to main content
· 9/21/2001

Nold Ex Rel. Nold v. Binyon

Citations

  • 31 P.3d 274
  • 272 Kan. 87
  • 2001 Kan. LEXIS 596

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court erred in excluding proffered testimony of plaintiffs expert medical witness on the breach of the standard of care of defendant hospital’s nurses
  • holding judgment as a matter of law is unavailable where potentially liable party’s alleged negligence not considered by jury
  • malpractice for physician to fail to inform pregnant patient if test results show she has a communicable disease that can be transmitted to the baby
  • “Cox found it improper for a doctor to testify regarding his or her own preferred method of treatment in determining whether another doctor deviated from the appropriate standard of care.”
  • woman’s physician has duty to inform

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Six, McFarland, Beier

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.