· 9/21/2001
Nold Ex Rel. Nold v. Binyon
Citations
- 31 P.3d 274
- 272 Kan. 87
- 2001 Kan. LEXIS 596
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the trial court erred in excluding proffered testimony of plaintiffs expert medical witness on the breach of the standard of care of defendant hospital’s nurses
- holding judgment as a matter of law is unavailable where potentially liable party’s alleged negligence not considered by jury
- malpractice for physician to fail to inform pregnant patient if test results show she has a communicable disease that can be transmitted to the baby
- “Cox found it improper for a doctor to testify regarding his or her own preferred method of treatment in determining whether another doctor deviated from the appropriate standard of care.”
- woman’s physician has duty to inform
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Six, McFarland, Beier
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.