Skip to main content
· 3/13/1995

Jones v. Owings

Citations

  • 456 S.E.2d 371
  • 318 S.C. 72
  • 1995 S.C. LEXIS 41

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to adopt the \loss of chance\ doctrine in South Carolina
  • \[l]egal responsibility in this approach is in reality assigned based on the mere possibility that a tortfeasor's negligence was a cause of the ultimate harm\
  • “[l]egal responsibility in this approach is in reality assigned based on the mere possibility that a tortfeasor’s negligence was a cause of the ultimate harm”
  • the “proportional approach” is also known as the “pure” standard
  • “[W]e decline to adopt the doctrine and maintain our traditional approach.”
  • declining to adopt the loss of chance doctrine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Toal, Finney, Moore, Waller, Chandler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.