Supreme Court of South Carolina· 3/13/1995
Jones v. Owings
Citations
- 456 S.E.2d 371
- 318 S.C. 72
- 1995 S.C. LEXIS 41
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- declining to adopt the \loss of chance\ doctrine in South Carolina
- \[l]egal responsibility in this approach is in reality assigned based on the mere possibility that a tortfeasor's negligence was a cause of the ultimate harm\
- “[l]egal responsibility in this approach is in reality assigned based on the mere possibility that a tortfeasor’s negligence was a cause of the ultimate harm”
- the “proportional approach” is also known as the “pure” standard
- “[W]e decline to adopt the doctrine and maintain our traditional approach.”
- declining to adopt the loss of chance doctrine
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Toal, Finney, Moore, Waller, Chandler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Weymers v. KheraMichigan Supreme Court· 1997-06-17· cited 294×
- Taylor v. MedenicaSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-11-12· cited 102×
- Matsuyama v. BirnbaumMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2008-07-23· cited 76×
- Mohr v. GranthamWashington Supreme Court· 2011-10-13· cited 74×
- Ensink v. Mecosta County General HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals· 2004-09-01· cited 67×
- Smith v. ParrottSupreme Court of Vermont· 2003-08-01· cited 36×
- Contois v. Town of West WarwickSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2004-12-17· cited 31×
- United States v. AndersonSupreme Court of Delaware· 1995-11-22· cited 29×
- Burroughs v. WorshamCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-12-09· cited 28×
- Haselden v. DavisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2000-06-19· cited 26×
- Martasin v. Hilton Head Health System, L.P.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-05-02· cited 16×
- Crosby v. Glasscock Trucking Co., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-05-22· cited 14×
- Crosby v. United StatesD. Alaska· 1999-04-09· cited 12×
- Estate of Frey v. Mastroianni.Hawaii Supreme Court· 2020-05-05· cited 11×
- Hendricks v. Clemson UniversityCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2000-03-20· cited 8×
- Grant v. American National Red CrossDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2000-02-17· cited 8×
- State v. McAteerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1998-12-21· cited 5×
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Hamil v. BashlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-10-05· cited 562×
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1993-08-20· cited 547×
- Kramer v. Lewisville Memorial HospitalTexas Supreme Court· 1993-09-10· cited 346×
- Gooding v. University Hosp. Bldg., Inc.Supreme Court of Florida· 1984-01-19· cited 243×
- Kilpatrick v. BryantTennessee Supreme Court· 1993-12-22· cited 241×
- McKellips v. Saint Francis Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1987-07-21· cited 191×
- Herskovits v. Group Health CooperativeWashington Supreme Court· 1983-05-26· cited 186×
- Thompson v. Sun City Community Hospital, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court· 1984-06-12· cited 147×
- Perez v. Las Vegas Medical CenterNevada Supreme Court· 1991-02-01· cited 123×
- DeBurkarte v. LouvarSupreme Court of Iowa· 1986-09-17· cited 121×
- Thornton v. CAMC, ETC.West Virginia Supreme Court· 1983-07-08· cited 98×
- Wollen v. DePaul Health CenterSupreme Court of Missouri· 1992-04-02· cited 93×
- Aasheim v. HumbergerMontana Supreme Court· 1985-02-21· cited 91×
- Delaney v. CadeSupreme Court of Kansas· 1994-04-22· cited 88×
- Manning v. Twin Falls Clinic & Hospital, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court· 1992-04-08· cited 85×
- Fennell v. Southern Maryland Hospital Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-10-09· cited 60×
- Grody v. TulinSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1976-03-30· cited 52×
- Hanselmann v. McCardleSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1980-06-02· cited 51×
- Pillsbury-Flood v. Portsmouth HospitalSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1986-07-17· cited 51×
- Ladner v. CampbellMississippi Supreme Court· 1987-11-04· cited 48×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.