· 3/13/1995
Jones v. Owings
Citations
- 456 S.E.2d 371
- 318 S.C. 72
- 1995 S.C. LEXIS 41
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- declining to adopt the \loss of chance\ doctrine in South Carolina
- \[l]egal responsibility in this approach is in reality assigned based on the mere possibility that a tortfeasor's negligence was a cause of the ultimate harm\
- “[l]egal responsibility in this approach is in reality assigned based on the mere possibility that a tortfeasor’s negligence was a cause of the ultimate harm”
- the “proportional approach” is also known as the “pure” standard
- “[W]e decline to adopt the doctrine and maintain our traditional approach.”
- declining to adopt the loss of chance doctrine
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Toal, Finney, Moore, Waller, Chandler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.