Skip to main content

Delafuente v. State

Citations

  • 414 S.W.3d 173
  • 2013 WL 6182437
  • 2013 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1734

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • distinguishing Ford and explaining that although the officer used “a legally meaningful phrase to describe what he saw,” he also “provided other facts to support that statement”
  • describing the bifurcated standard of review requiring appellate courts to give almost total deference to a trial judge’s findings of historical fact and credibility determinations supported by the record
  • “Taken together, these facts and inferences are sufficient to lead a reasonable officer to conclude that appellant was engaged in criminal activity, namely a violation of [Texas Transportation Code] Section 545.363(a).”
  • “Taken together, these facts and inferences are sufficient to lead a reasonable officer to conclude that appellant was engaged in criminal activity, namely a violation of [Texas Transportation Code] Section 545.363(a).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson, Alcala, Keller, Meyers, Price, Keasler, Hervey, Cochran, Womack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

53 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Delafuente v. State

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.