Skip to main content

Bishop v. State

Citations

  • 85 S.W.3d 819
  • 2002 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 180
  • 2002 WL 31116685

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • trial court may use live testimony of some witnesses and affidavits of others to determine motion
  • “By providing for a determination of the merits of such a motion on the motion itself, Art. 28.01, § 1(6), established the motion to suppress as the basis for an allegation of a Fourth Amendment violation.”
  • “Appellant’s motion to suppress asserted that the traffic stop and search were done without a 3 warrant. By providing for a determination of the merits of such a motion on the motion itself, Art. 28.01, § 1(6
  • State has burden of proof in warrantless seizure
  • State has burden of proof in warrantless seizure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

90 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.