State of Texas v. Saenz, Clint

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding trial court’s findings were inadequate as to historical facts that reviewing court was to consider when making ultimate legal determination of whether appellee was in custody
• holding the duration of an interrogation and the exercise of -4 04-12-00739-CR control over a suspect during an interrogation are circumstances that, when combined with a manifestation ofprobable cause, may establish an interrogation was custodial
• holding the duration of an interrogation and the exercise of -4- 04-12-00739-CR control over a suspect during an interrogation are circumstances that, when combined with a manifestation of probable cause, may establish an interrogation was custodial
• reversing and remanding for additional fact findings because dispositive historical facts were absent from trial court's findings
• trial court’s findings “inadequate to make the ultimate legal determination of whether appellee was in custody at the time of the challenged statements.”
• trial court’s findings “inadequate to make the ultimate legal determination of whether appellee was in custody at the time of the challenged statements.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).