Skip to main content
· 4/11/1977

Kishner v. Kishner

Citations

  • 562 P.2d 493
  • 93 Nev. 220
  • 1977 Nev. LEXIS 520

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the district court \has inherent power to construe its judgments and decrees for the purpose of removing any ambiguity\
  • vacating an order clarifying a judgment and decree because the judgment and decree was not ambiguous, and thus, no clarification was warranted
  • vacating an order clarifying a judgment and decree because the judgment and decree was not ambiguous, and thus, no clarification was warranted
  • vacating an order clarifying a judgment and decree because the judgment and decree was not ambiguous, and thus, no clarification was warranted
  • vacating an order clarifying a judgment and decree because the judgment and decree was not ambiguous, and thus, no clarification was warranted
  • noting the court's inherent authority to construe its judgments to remove an ambiguity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stanley Smart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.