· 4/11/1977
Kishner v. Kishner
Citations
- 562 P.2d 493
- 93 Nev. 220
- 1977 Nev. LEXIS 520
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the district court \has inherent power to construe its judgments and decrees for the purpose of removing any ambiguity\
- vacating an order clarifying a judgment and decree because the judgment and decree was not ambiguous, and thus, no clarification was warranted
- vacating an order clarifying a judgment and decree because the judgment and decree was not ambiguous, and thus, no clarification was warranted
- vacating an order clarifying a judgment and decree because the judgment and decree was not ambiguous, and thus, no clarification was warranted
- vacating an order clarifying a judgment and decree because the judgment and decree was not ambiguous, and thus, no clarification was warranted
- noting the court's inherent authority to construe its judgments to remove an ambiguity
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stanley Smart
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.