Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Federal Claims· 6/20/2003

De Archibold v. United States

Citations

  • 57 Fed. Cl. 29
  • 2003 U.S. Claims LEXIS 171
  • 2003 WL 21513055

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “because plaintiffs’ express contract claim is based solely on” an international agreement, “this court does not have jurisdiction”
  • “The law of Panama, a foreign country, cannot act as the waiver of sovereign immunity that is required for Tucker Act jurisdiction in this court.”
  • “The law of Panama, a foreign country, cannot act as the waiver of sovereign immunity that is required for Tucker Act jurisdiction in this court.”
  • “The law of Panama, a foreign country, cannot act as the waiver of sovereign immunity that is required for Tucker Act jurisdiction in this court.”
  • “The law of Panama, a foreign country, cannot act as the waiver of sovereign immunity that is required for Tucker Act jurisdiction in this court.”
  • “It is well-established that a duty imposed by law does not create a contract within the Tucker Act jurisdiction of this court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hewitt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named De Archibold v. United States

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.