City of Cincinnati v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Like an express contract, an implied-in-fact contract requires ‘(1) mutuality of intent to contract; (2) consideration; and, (3
• although the issue was not before the court, the court indicated that a city's storm drainage service charge imposed on a federal building might not be an impermissible state tax on the federal government, but a permissible service fee

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).