District Court of Appeal of Florida· 7/26/2013
Day v. State
Citations
- 119 So. 3d 485
- 2013 WL 3853227
- 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 11763
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding the failure to instruct the jury on a prescription defense was not fundamental error because defendant admitted at the time of arrest and in a later interview that he purchased the pills illegally
- upholding Day’s conviction and sentence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Clark, Lewis, Ray
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Martinez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2008-02-21· cited 123×
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1988-01-21· cited 87×
- McCoy v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-12-21· cited 22×
- O'HARA v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-09-19· cited 16×
- Wagner v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-01-11· cited 9×
- State v. LatonaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-12-02· cited 7×
- Ayotte v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-07-07· cited 7×
- Ramirez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-01-16· cited 7×
- Glovacz v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-03-02· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.