Skip to main content

Wagner v. State

Citations

  • 88 So. 3d 250
  • 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 156
  • 2012 WL 75107

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \A valid prescription is a complete defense to trafficking and a defendant is entitled to a jury instruction on this defense.\
  • defendant signed a statement that he had not received any narcotic medication from another doctor
  • “We further hold that [defendant’s] subsequent decision to sell the contents of his prescription did not affect the validity of the prescription.”
  • “A valid prescription is a complete defense to trafficking and a defendant is entitled to a jury instruction on the defense.” (citing O’Hara v. State, 964 So.2d 839, 847 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Conner, Gillespie, Kenneth, Polen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.