Davitashvili v. Grubhub

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Section 2’s arising-out-of language limits the FAA’s 16 scope to controversies that were caused by the contractual relationship
• holding that a clickwrap agreement put users on sufficient notice to constitute a valid agreement
• “Plaintiffs must show why allowing an arbitrator—as opposed to a court—to decide the question of arbitrability would be unconscionable.”
• “[C]ourts should not assume that the parties agreed to arbitrate arbitrability unless there is clear and unmistakable evidence that they did so.”
• “Grubhub’s arbitration clause does not apply to Plaintiffs’ antitrust claims against 17 Grubhub because Plaintiffs’ antitrust claims do not arise out of the Terms of Use.”
• “The FAA’s scope is limited to ‘agreements to arbitrate controversies that “arise out of” 14 the parties’ contractual relationship’—that is, controversies that were ‘cause[d]’ by the relationship.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Sudakow v. CleanChoice Energy, Inc.
  Second Circuit· 2025-08-27

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1983-02-23· cited 9,657×
• First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. Kaplan
  Supreme Court· 1995-05-22· cited 4,743×
• Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.
  Supreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 2,844×
• Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. Casarotto
  Supreme Court· 1996-06-03· cited 1,668×
• Henry Schein, Inc. v. Archer & White Sales, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 2019-01-08· cited 1,244×
• City of New York v. Mickalis Pawn Shop, LLC
  Second Circuit· 2011-05-04· cited 1,026×
• Nicosia v. Amazon.com, Inc.
  Second Circuit· 2016-08-25· cited 986×
• Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis
  Supreme Court· 2018-05-21· cited 946×
• American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurant
  Supreme Court· 2013-06-20· cited 796×
• Morgan v. Sundance, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 2022-05-23· cited 620×
• Meyer v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
  Second Circuit· 2017-08-17· cited 511×
• Genesco, Inc. v. T. Kakiuchi & Co.
  Second Circuit· 1987-04-01· cited 414×
• CONTEC CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee, v. REMOTE SOLUTION CO., LTD., Defendant-Counterclaimant-Appellant
  Second Circuit· 2005-02-14· cited 361×
• BG Group, PLC v. Republic of Argentina
  Supreme Court· 2014-03-05· cited 319×
• Schnabel v. Trilegiant Corp. & Affinion, Inc.
  Second Circuit· 2012-09-07· cited 282×
• Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Hudson River-Black River Regulating District
  Second Circuit· 2012-03-07· cited 267×
• Express Industries & Terminal Corp. v. New York State Department of Transportation
  New York Court of Appeals· 1999-07-08· cited 259×
• Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana
  Supreme Court· 2022-06-15· cited 205×
• Starke v. SquareTrade, Inc.
  Second Circuit· 2019-01-10· cited 200×
• Kpmg LLP v. Cocchi
  Supreme Court· 2011-11-07· cited 189×