Skip to main content

Davis v. State

Citations

  • 831 S.E.2d 804

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “in the absence of explicit factual and credibility findings by the trial court, we presume implicit findings were made supporting the trial court’s decision”
  • reviewing “the trial court’s factual findings and credibility determinations” for “clear error” and the court’s ultimate denial of a motion to withdraw a guilty plea for “abuse of discretion”
  • “[I]n the absence of explicit factual and credibility findings by the trial court, we presume implicit findings were made supporting the trial court’s decision.”
  • “[I]n the absence of explicit factual and credibility findings by the trial court, we presume implicit findings were made supporting the trial court’s decision.”
  • “The trial court was authorized to credit the testimony of the defendant’s counsel, and its factual findings and credibility determinations will be accepted unless clearly erroneous.” (citation and punctuation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Warren

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.