Skip to main content

Anthony v. State

Citations

  • 857 S.E.2d 682
  • 311 Ga. 293

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “[w]ith respect to closing argument, defense counsel is permitted wide latitude” and is not ineffective simply because another attorney might have made a different choice
  • explaining, in the context of an ineffective assistance claim, that the trial court was authorized to implicitly credit trial counsel’s testimony at the motion-for-new-trial hearing over the appellant’s contradictory testimony
  • in the absence of explicit credibility findings by the trial court, we presume implicit findings were made supporting the trial court’s decision
  • “[c]ounsel’s strategic choice to concede guilt . . . is not impeded by any blanket rule demanding the defendant’s explicit consent”
  • “We note that because no convictions were entered on Anthony’s felony murder charges, his ineffective assistance claims are moot to the extent they pertain to the portions of trial counsel’s closing argument that reference felony murder.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.