Skip to main content

Davis v. State

Citations

  • 962 S.W.2d 815
  • 60 Ark. App. 179
  • 1998 Ark. App. LEXIS 36

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming introduction of testimony regarding prior drug sales to show that appellant had engaged in similar transactions with different people
  • finding no terror in trial court’s admission of prior, uncharged misconduct during sentencing phase
  • finding no error in trial court’s admission of prior, uncharged misconduct during sentencing phase
  • finding no error in circuit court’s admission of prior, uncharged misconduct during sentencing phase
  • affirming the admission of evidence during the sentencing phase that the defendant, who had been convicted of delivery of a controlled substance, had made prior drug sales, even though he was not prosecuted for that conduct
  • affirming the admission of evidence during the sentencing phase that the defendant, who had been convicted of delivery of a controlled substance, had made prior drug sales, even though he was not prosecuted for that conduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jennings, Arey, Stroud

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.